🇺🇲 Red Lines in the Caribbean: How Washington Signals Beijing Through Venezuela and Panama
CDR José Adán Gutiérrez, USN (Ret.) Senior Fellow, MSI² - Dr. Rafael Marrero, Founder and CEO, MSI²
Abstract
The United States’ recent naval strike on a Venezuelan vessel and the accompanying escalation of military deployments in the Caribbean are not isolated tactical moves aimed solely at Nicolás Maduro’s regime. Rather, they represent a broader demonstration of American resolve in the face of China’s expanding economic, technological, and geopolitical footprint in the Western Hemisphere. While dislodging Maduro remains a near-term operational objective, the deeper strategic purpose of Washington’s actions lies in signaling Beijing that the United States is prepared to deploy hard power to defend its primacy in the region.
This paper situates U.S. actions within three concentric layers: Venezuela as the trigger, Panama as the hinge, and China as the target. The strike in the Caribbean should be interpreted as a reverberation of Washington’s earlier Panama posture — a hemispheric echo designed to redraw strategic red lines for Beijing. By integrating historical precedent, trade and Canal data, regional political dynamics, and risk assessments, this analysis demonstrates how U.S. credibility depends both on military presence as well as on sustained economic, digital, and institutional engagement.
Executive Summary
The U.S. strike against a Venezuelan vessel and reinforcement of naval presence in the Caribbean reflect a three-layered message:
1. Immediate Layer — Venezuela: Maduro is targeted as a narco-state leader and proxy of extra-hemispheric actors. But Venezuela is the stage, not the play.
2. Intermediate Layer — Panama: The Canal remains the critical artery of hemispheric commerce. China’s growing presence in Panama — from ports to telecom — challenges U.S. dominance. Washington’s naval posture and renewed cooperation with Panama signal a red line: the Canal will not be surrendered.
3. Strategic Layer — China: Beijing is the true audience. The U.S. is demonstrating it will not cede its hemisphere, even at the risk of confrontation.
Key Findings:
• China has entrenched itself in Panama, Argentina, Chile, Brazil, and Honduras through infrastructure, energy, and debt diplomacy (Ellis, 2023; Gutierrez, 2025a, 2025b, 2025d).
• The Canal handles ~6% of global trade; U.S. credibility hinges on keeping it free of Chinese control. Recent drought-driven restrictions further highlight its fragility (Panama Canal Authority, 2024; Reuters, 2024; Gutierrez, 2025c).
• Latin America is divided: elites often tilt toward Chinese financing, but publics remain wary of authoritarian influence (Pew Research, 2024).
• U.S. power projection reassures allies but carries risks of escalation, overstretch, and intensified PRC information warfare (Marrero, 2025).
Policy Recommendations:
• Continue institutionalizing U.S.–Panama security cooperation to safeguard the Canal.
• Scale up Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) funding to provide alternatives to Chinese loans.
• Launch a digital sovereignty initiative to counter Huawei’s dominance.
• Expand U.S. public diplomacy, media, and counter-disinformation programs to challenge Chinese narratives.
• Deepen coalition building with Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, and Panama for coordinated hemispheric defense.
Introduction
The crisis in Venezuela has become a proxy theater for larger geopolitical competition. In August 2025, the Trump Administration raised the bounty on Nicolás Maduro to $50 million and authorized naval actions against Venezuelan vessels accused of narcotrafficking. While framed as a crackdown on a rogue regime, the strike resonated far beyond Caracas.
The broader logic lies in the shifting balance of power in the Western Hemisphere. China has embedded itself in Panama’s ports and digital infrastructure, Argentina’s space facilities, Chile’s lithium mines, Brazil’s agribusiness, and most recently, Honduras’ diplomatic and economic reorientation (Ellis, 2021; Gutierrez, 2025a, 2025b, 2025d). The Western Hemisphere, once an uncontested U.S. strategic space, is now contested terrain.
The naval strike is therefore not just about Venezuela. It is the Caribbean echo of a Panama punch — a hemispheric message to Beijing that Washington will reassert primacy through hard power if necessary (Gutierrez, 2025c). This echoes a lineage of U.S. hemispheric doctrines — from the Monroe Doctrine to Roosevelt’s corollary — updated for the 21st-century contest with China.
Section I: The Immediate Trigger — Venezuela
Washington has long framed Maduro as both an illegitimate authoritarian and a cartel kingpin. The $50 million bounty, the highest ever placed on a sitting head of state by the U.S., reflects that framing (U.S. Department of State, 2025). The strike on a Venezuelan vessel fits the narrative: Maduro’s regime is not sovereign, but criminal.
Yet Maduro is a proxy variable. He serves Beijing’s purposes as a supplier of crude oil and a diplomatic irritant for Washington, but China will not expend capital to save him (Cacciati, 2025). Venezuela is the trigger — not the target.
At the same time, Washington’s calibrated approach is evident: U.S. sanctions remain in place, yet Chevron retains limited licenses to operate in Venezuela. This dual track underscores that Venezuela is treated as a managed problem — a stage for signaling, not the centerpiece of U.S. regional policy.
Section II: China’s Expanding Footprint in Latin America
China’s strategy is patient, diversified, and cumulative:
• Panama: After recognizing Beijing in 2017, Panama opened doors to Chinese firms. COSCO Shipping gained port concessions near Colón, and Huawei built much of the telecom backbone (Ellis, 2023; Gutierrez, 2025c). Chinese bids for Canal-adjacent logistics parks sparked alarm in Washington.
• Argentina: The Neuquén space station, nominally civilian, operates under opaque terms and is widely suspected of dual-use military functions (Rios, 2024; Gutierrez, 2025b).
• Chile: China dominates lithium processing, controlling stakes in SQM and Tianqi Lithium. By 2024, over 60% of Chile’s lithium exports flowed to China (IEA, 2024; Gutierrez, 2025a).
• Brazil: Beijing has become Brazil’s top trading partner, buying soybeans, oil, and minerals. Brazil’s membership in BRICS and embrace of Chinese financing broaden Beijing’s hemispheric leverage (Ellis, 2022).
• Cuba: China has invested in signals intelligence infrastructure and digital projects, raising suspicions of surveillance cooperation (Ellis, 2021).
• Honduras: After switching recognition from Taiwan to Beijing in 2023, Honduras welcomed PRC projects in energy and telecommunications, signaling that Chinese influence now sits directly in Central America (Gutierrez, 2025d).
• Debt Diplomacy: Ecuador and Venezuela illustrate how Chinese loans lock governments into long-term repayment deals secured by oil shipments, limiting sovereignty (Marrero, 2025).
This is not conquest but slow capture. Beijing avoids overt military confrontation, preferring economic leverage, elite partnerships, and influence operations in Spanish-language media. Yet the aggregate effect undermines U.S. primacy (Gutierrez, 2025e).
Section III: U.S. Strategic Messaging
The naval strike should be read as layered signaling:
1. Deterrence Theater: The imagery of U.S. destroyers patrolling the Caribbean recalls Operation Just Cause in 1989 and the steady counternarcotics patrols of the 1990s. The message: Washington still owns escalation dominance.
2. Panama as Hinge: The Canal handles ~6% of global trade and ~14,000 vessels annually. Forty percent of U.S. containerized trade with Asia passes through its locks (Panama Canal Authority, 2024). Recent drought-related restrictions in 2023–24 cut Canal capacity by up to 40%, underscoring both its fragility and its global economic centrality (Reuters, 2024). By conducting exercises with Panamanian forces and docking warships in Balboa, Washington underscores that the Canal is off-limits to Beijing’s ambitions (Gutierrez, 2025c).
3. Reverberation Strategy: The Panama push was the first strike; the Caribbean deployment is the echo. Together, they form a hemispheric perimeter defense.
Section IV: The China–Venezuela–U.S. Triangle
China’s stance on Venezuela illustrates its pragmatism. It continues oil purchases, offers symbolic diplomatic support, and provides consumer tech, but avoids entangling military commitments (South China Morning Post, 2025).
Russia and Iran, by contrast, have tested military support to Caracas, but lack the resources to project sustained power in the hemisphere. Beijing, the true competitor, keeps its distance — preferring to strengthen its hand in Panama, Brazil, Chile, and now Honduras (Ellis, 2022; Gutierrez, 2025b, 2025d).
Thus:
• U.S. treats Venezuela as an expendable stage.
• China treats Venezuela as an expendable pawn.
• The real contest is Panama and the Canal.
Section V: Regional Implications
1. Latin American States: Forced to choose between U.S. security guarantees and Chinese financing. Public opinion remains ambivalent: a 2024 Pew survey found 63% of Latin Americans preferred economic ties with the U.S., but elites in countries like Panama, Argentina, and Brazil continue to court Chinese capital (Gutierrez, 2025d).
2. Allies: Colombia and Brazil’s military see U.S. deployments as reassurance of Washington’s staying power.
3. Adversaries: Russia and Iran face limits in sustaining hemispheric operations; U.S. moves remind them of escalation ceilings.
4. Panama: Local elites, including the Motta family, are split — some favor U.S. security guarantees, others prize Chinese investments. The Canal is once again global chessboard territory (Gutierrez, 2025c).
Section VI: Risk Assessment
1. Escalation Risks: A miscalculation at sea could trigger increased conflict.
2. Overstretch: With Indo-Pacific commitments, sustaining a high-intensity posture in the Caribbean may strain U.S. resources.
3. Chinese Counters: Beijing could retaliate by squeezing U.S. companies in Latin America, leveraging supply chain dependencies, or offering increased counter-financing packages (Marrero, 2022).
4. Information Domain: PRC-sponsored media outlets, state-linked influencers, and Spanish-language digital campaigns are actively shaping narratives, challenging U.S. positions, and amplifying anti-American sentiment.
Section VII: Policy Recommendations
1. Institutionalize Canal Security: Establish a U.S.–Panama security framework akin to NATO’s Article 5 for the Canal.
2. Fund Alternatives: Expand DFC and IDB loans to undercut Chinese debt diplomacy.
3. Digital Sovereignty: Launch a U.S.-led regional telecom initiative to provide alternatives to Huawei.
4. Media & Influence Operations: Expand think tank, academic, and public media support to counter Chinese narratives and disinformation.
5. Military Posture: Sustain naval rotations in the Caribbean and Pacific, while reinforcing SOUTHCOM’s intelligence footprint.
6. Regional Coalition: Build a trilateral/multilateral security compact with Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, and Panama to demonstrate that hemispheric defense is collective, not unilateral.
Conclusion
The naval strike on a Venezuelan vessel is a hemispheric signal. Maduro is incidental; China is the audience. By linking Panama and the Caribbean into a unified strategic theater, Washington is asserting that hemispheric primacy will not be ceded.
Venezuela is the spark, Panama is the fuse, and China is the powder keg.
For U.S. credibility to endure, demonstrations of power must also be matched with economic, digital, and institutional engagement. Only then can Washington ensure that the reverberation from Panama to the Caribbean resounds as a clear message: the United States remains the guardian of the hemisphere.
References
Cacciati, M. (2025, August 26). China will let Maduro sink rather than confront US warships. LATAM Blog.
Ellis, E. R. (2023). China in Latin America: The evolving strategic landscape. U.S. Army War College Press.
Ellis, E. R. (2022). China engages Latin America: Distorting development and democracy? Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Ellis, E. R. (2021). Chinese engagement in Latin America in the era of strategic competition. Air University Press.
Gutiérrez, J. A. (2025a). China’s presence and influence in Chile: A geostrategic and economic analysis. Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute.
Gutiérrez, J. A. (2025b). Argentina’s preferential shift toward China: Strategic realignment or economic necessity? Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute.
Gutiérrez, J. A. (2025c). Panama: A strategic battleground in the U.S.–China rivalry. Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute.
Gutiérrez, J. A. (2025d). Honduras, China, and U.S. strategic balancing: Risks and opportunities in Central America. Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute.
Gutiérrez, J. A. (2025e). Bracing for the second shock: Renewed U.S. strategy toward China in Latin America. Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute.
International Energy Agency. (2024). Global critical minerals outlook. Paris: IEA.
Marrero, R. (2025). La Última Frontera: Crónica de la Resistencia de EE. UU. Contra la China Comunista. Bravo Zulu Publishers.
Marrero, R. (2022). América 2.0: la guerra de independencia de EE. UU. contra China. Bravo Zulu Publishers.
Panama Canal Authority. (2024). Annual transit and trade statistics report. Panama City: PCA.
Reuters. (2024, December 12). Panama Canal drought cuts capacity as shipping costs surge.
Rios, V. (2024). China’s space presence in Argentina: Dual-use risks and strategic ambiguity. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(2), 215–234.
South China Morning Post. (2025, July 18). Beijing rejects U.S. “Cold War mentality” over Latin America deployments.
U.S. Department of State. (2025, August 15). Narcotics rewards program: Nicolás Maduro Moros. Washington, D.C.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute (MSI²).